Williams Takes 3-2 Win Over Amherst for 2007 Volleyball Championship

Courtesy Amherst Sports Information

Box Score:  Williams 3, Amherst 2

AMHERST, Mass. - Second-seeded Williams came away with a 3-2 victory over top-seeded Amherst on Sunday in the final match of the 2007 NESCAC Volleyball Championship. The match pitted the two finalists from last year's championship against each other once again, as Amherst claimed the 2006 title by a 3-1 score at Williams. The Ephs earned their first championship since 2004 and seventh overall. Amherst moves to 27-4 on the year and will hope for an at-large bid to the NCAA tournament, while Williams improves to 27-7 and earns an automatic berth.

Home court advantage was clearly not going to be a factor, as LeFrak Gymnasium was packed with just as many Williams fans as Amherst fans. The Ephs and Jeffs were equally sharp coming out of the gate, with Williams leading for most of game one until Amherst went on top, 16-15. The rest of the game was a back-and-forth battle, but Williams held on for a 30-27 win in a game that featured 16 ties and six lead changes, with neither team leading by more than three points at any time.

Amherst jumped out to a 5-1 advantage in the second game and never handed the lead over to Williams, as the Jeffs led by as many as six points and were in control for most of the way. The Ephs refused to go away, however, and stormed back to tie things up at 22-22, but a huge block from junior Sara Heller (La Canada, Calif.) put a stop to Williams' momentum. The Ephs tied the game once again at 27-27, but a crucial Eph receiving error allowed Amherst to pull ahead for good, as the Jeffs held on for a 30-27 victory to tie the match at one game apiece.

The Ephs regained composure and led by five early in the third game before taking a commanding 17-10 lead that forced Amherst to call a timeout. The Jeffs were able to creep to within three points several times and pulled to within two at the very end, but Williams took a two-games-to-one lead with yet another 30-27 win.

With Amherst's back to the wall, the home fans grew rowdy and gave a true sense of home court advantage. The fourth game looked as though it would be the closest yet until the Jeffs went ahead by six points after some great play from senior tri-captain Jaclyn DeMais (Hillsdale, N.J.), but the Ephs once again refused to go away and cut the deficit to one, as they trailed 19-18. The Jeffs rattled off four consecutive points to pull ahead by five, but before long the teams were notched at 25-25.

A crucial Amherst block broke the 25-25 tie and the Jeffs scored five unanswered points to send the match to a fifth and deciding game, as the NESCAC title came down to a race to 15 points. Amherst took an early timeout in the final game after Williams scored the first three points, but the Ephs' run did not stop there, as the top seed found itself in a 5-0 hole.

The teams switched sides after Williams took an 8-4 lead and the Jeffs were unable to cut their deficit to less than three, as the Ephs held on for a 15-9 win to secure their seventh NESCAC crown in program history. Williams' victory marked the first upset of the tournament.

Williams first-year sensation Emily Avis (Palo Alto, Calif.) set a NESCAC Championship record with her 71 assists and added 15 digs, while fellow rookies Kate Anderson (Berlin, Mass.) and Nicole Ballon-Landa (La Jolla, Calif.) had 11 kills and 23 kills, respectively, with Ballon-Landa adding seven blocks.

The Eph sophomore class was just as impressive, with Alisha Cahlan (Las Vegas, Nev.) totaling 18 kills and four block assists, Melissa Pun (San Francisco, Calif.) adding 14 kills and 21 digs, and Chelsea Kubal (Atherton, Calif.) racking up 36 digs.

DeMais was her usual brilliant self with 25 kills, 35 digs and five blocks, while fellow tri-captain Whitney Kouvaris (Jacksonville, Fla.) adding 19 kills. Junior Claire Holton-Basaldua (San Rafael, Calif.) had 15 kills and six blocks for the Jeffs, first-year Rachel Yorke (Los Angeles, Calif.) had an impressive 39 digs, and junior Sara Heller (La Canada, Calif.) chalked up 59 assists.

2007 NESCAC VOLLEYBALL CHAMPIONSHIP
Quarterfinals - Friday, November 2 at Amherst
at No. 1 Amherst 3, No. 8 Bowdoin 1
vs. No. 2 Williams 3, No. 7 Middlebury 0
vs. No. 3 Tufts 3, No. 6 Trinity  0
vs. No. 4 Connecticut College 3, No. 5 Wesleyan 0

Semifinals - Saturday, November 3 at Amherst
at No. 1 Amherst 3, No. 4 Connecticut College 1
vs. No. 2 Williams 3, No. 3 Tufts 0

Championship - Sunday, November 4 at Amherst
No. 2 Williams 3, at No. 1 Amherst 2

2007 NESCAC VOLLEYBALL CHAMPIONSHIP

Friday, November 2 - Sunday, November 4
at No. 1 Seed

Friday, November 2
6:00 p.m.
No. 8 at No. 1
No. 7 vs. No. 2
8:00 p.m.
No. 6 vs. No. 3
No. 5 vs. No. 4

Semifinals - Saturday, November 3
Winner No.1/No. 8 vs. Winner No. 4/No. 5 - 1:00 p.m.
Winner No. 2/No. 7 vs. Winner No. 3/No. 6 - 3:30 p.m.

Championship - Sunday, November 4
Semifinal Winners - 1:00 p.m.

Format
The top 8 teams in the conference will qualify for the NESCAC Volleyball Championship beginning Friday, November 2 through Sunday, November 4.  The tournament champion will receive an automatic bid to the NCAA Division III Championship.  

Seeding
Seeding will be based on final conference standings of round robin play. The highest seeded team will host the Championship.

Pairings
Pairings will be announced Sunday, October 28.

Tie Breaking Procedures
Ties will be broken as follows:

Head-to-head result (if teams play each other more than once during the regular season, the game that appears on the league schedule will be the game that is counted).

If teams tied during the regular season, or there is a 3-way or more tie, the following tie breaking procedure will be used:

• Best match record among tying teams, against one another (head-to-head).
• Best game record among tying teams, against one another (head-to-head).
• Point differential of matches between tied teams (points scored-points scored against).
• Comparison of results of conference games played against top 4 teams (including all teams at the 4th spot).
• Comparison of results of conference games played against top 8 teams (including all teams at the 8th spot).
• Comparison of results of conference games played against conference teams in rank order.  Comparisons shall be made one team at a time starting with the highest ranked team.
• If the tie remains after comparing results against the highest ranked team, the results against the next team in rank order shall be used. This process is continued until a winner is determined.
• Coin flip (or similar random action involving all tied teams).

Note: In case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria above will be applied in order until a team is (or teams are) separated.  At that point, the process begins anew (returning to the first criteria) with the remaining teams.  The process is continued until the tie is eventually broken.  In cases where only a random action will break the tie of three or more teams, the random action will be applied to all teams involved in the tie.  For example, if three teams are tied and only a random action (pulling names out of a hat) will break the tie, each name will be pulled and seeded in order of being pulled.  Also, in the event that there are two (or more) groups of teams tied at different spots in the standings and the only criteria left that can be used to break those ties is a coin flip/random action, the coin flip/random action used to break the tie of one group (to put teams in rank order) will not affect the tie breaking procedures of the other group(s) of tied teams.